翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Heckler & Koch P9
・ Heckler & Koch PSG1
・ Heckler & Koch SL6
・ Heckler & Koch SL7
・ Heckler & Koch SL8
・ Heckler & Koch SR9
・ Heckler & Koch UCP
・ Heckler & Koch UMP
・ Heckler & Koch USP
・ Heckler & Koch VP70
・ Heckler & Koch VP9
・ Heckler (comics)
・ Heckler (disambiguation)
・ Heckler (film)
・ Heckler (surname)
Heckler v. Campbell
・ Heckler v. Chaney
・ Heckler's Hop
・ Heckler's veto
・ Hecklers Veto EP
・ Heckletooth Mountain
・ Heckling
・ Heckling (flax)
・ Heckling comb
・ Hecklingen
・ Heckman
・ Heckman correction
・ Heckman Pass
・ Heckman's Island, Nova Scotia
・ Heckmann


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Heckler v. Campbell : ウィキペディア英語版
Heckler v. Campbell

''Heckler v. Campbell'', , is a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services could rely on published medical-vocational guidelines to determine a claimant’s right to Social Security benefits.
== Background ==
In 1978, the Secretary of Health and Human Services promulgated regulations in order to implement the statutory definition of disability. People who were disabled were separated into two groups: those who could not perform any gainful work and those with less severe impairments. For this second group, the Secretary promulgated guidelines to examine whether the claimant could perform either his former work or some less demanding employment by creating a matrix that evaluated four factors that had been identified by Congress: physical ability, age, education, and work experience. Information was also compiled about what jobs were available.
Carmen Campbell claimed she had a back condition that kept her from working at her former job as a hotel maid. Ms. Campbell had been born in Panama, and though she had limited ability to speak and write English, she could read and understand English fairly well. The administrative law judge in her case found that by using the guidelines, there were a significant number of jobs that existed that Ms. Campbell could perform and concluded that she was not disabled.
Ms. Campbell's case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit which reversed the decision, saying that the guidelines did not provide evidence that specific alternative jobs existed, and that the determination that Ms. Campbell was disabled was not supported by substantial evidence as required by the Social Security Act.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Heckler v. Campbell」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.